Anwalt Deutschland Fachanwalt deutsch German Lawyer Germany English language Attorney-at-law English Lawyer germany french advocat francais allemagneFrench Attorney in Germany spanish language abogado alemania Spanish Attorney/ Lawyer in Germany Italian language avvocatto germania Italian Lawyer/ Attorney Germany Portuguese language advogado Alemanha Portuguese Polish speaking Lawyer/ Attorney in Germany adwokat Niemcy Polish Japanese speaking Lawyer/ Attorney in Germany Bengoshi Doitsu Japanese Attorney/ Lawyer Vietnamese language luat suVietnamese Korean speaking lawyer/ attorney in Germany, EuropeKorean Chinese language Lawyer/ Attorney in Germany/ EuropeChinese Lawyer/ Attorney russian speaking advokat Germaniya Russian

 

Attorney-at-Law Michael Horak, graduate engineer (Electrical Engineering), LL.M. (European Law) Julia Ziegeler, Attorney-at-law Attorney Umberg, LL.M., M.A. Andree Eckhard, Patent Attorney Katharina Gitmann, Attorney-at-law Karoline Behrend, Attorney-at-law Johanna K. Müller-Kühne, PhD, Patent Attorney Andreas Friedlein, Attorney-at-law Stefan Karfusehr, Attorney-at-law

horak.
Attorneys at law

 

 

Locations  Berlin  Bielefeld  Bremen  Düsseldorf  Frankfurt  Hamburg  Hanover  Munich  Stuttgart  Vienna
Overview  Practice  IP Law  Patent Law  Trademark Law  Law Office  Trademark Application  Patent filer  Sample Texts  German Acts  Court Rulings  Contact  Imprint  Privacy Policy  Links
ip attorney germany lawyer attorney law office germany german law european law patent law design law trademark law copyright law german law ip specialist media law music law film law event law entertainment law contracts license agreement draft contract under german law  hannover prosecution infringement patent trade name copyright reseller contract attorney patent law  utility model law unfair competition law anti trust lawyer
file trdaemark application patent application design application lawyer patent trademark attorney trademark searches similiarity search opposition file an infingement suit germany german attorney ip specialist copyright specialist food law plant law patent lawyer domain law internet law it law computer law

patents-trademarks-copyright-europe law lawyer german law german lawyer german attorney trade mark law patent law utility model law design law

ip-lawyer it lawyer attorney for patents trade specialist ip attorney  marks germany european lawyer trademark european community mark ct ect law europen patent office germany representation

ohim euipo representative german patent office munich lawyer germany ip attorney patent lawyer trademark lawyer patent attorney german patent attorney epo eurpean patent office reprsentation law firm european patent german patent austrian patent office intellectual property design lawyer copyright law trademark law patent attorney trademark attorney design attorney

... Start ... Overview ... Practice ... IP Law ... Utility Model Law
Start
General Terms and Conditions
Overview
Law Office
Jobs
Attorneys Fees
Michael Horak, LL.M., Attorney-at-law
Julia Ziegeler, Attorney-at-law
Anna Umberg, LL.M., M.A., Attorney-at-law
Andree Eckhard, Patent Attorney
Katharina Gitmann, Attorney-at-law
Karoline Behrend, Attorney-at-law
Johanna K. Müller-Kühne, PhD, Patent Attorney
Andreas Friedlein, Attorney-at-law
Stefan Karfusehr, Attorney-at-law
Practice
IP Law
Patent Law
Patent Application
Utility Model Law
Design Law
Trademark Law
Domain Law
Semiconductor Topographies
Plant Varieties and Seeds
Know-How Law
Copyright Law
Forms
Licence Law
Computer Law
Online Law
E-Commerce
E-Contract
Software Law
Media Law
Antitrust Law
Advertising Law
Competition Law
EC Competition Law
Vergleich
Admonishment
Admonishment-Sample
Foodstuffs Law
Pharmaceutical Law
Telecommunications Law
Commercial Law
Company Law
Plc Law
Small Stock Company
International Law
IR-Trademarks
Public Procurement Law
Fiscal and Economic Offences Law
Research
IP Search
IP Monitoring
Domain Research
Economic Research
Information Brokerage
Sample Texts
Forms and Sample Agreements
Confidentiality Agreement
Memorandum of Association
Contractual Clauses
Jurisdiction Clause
Return Right
German Acts
Patent Act
Trademark Act
Copyright Act
Employee Inventions Law
Competition Act
Teleservices Act
Court Rulings
Patent law
BGH-software-patent
Trademark law
BGH-Bonus2
BGH-ac-pharma
BGH-Blendaxpep
BGH-Acceleration-fee
BGH-Fuenfer
OLGFFM-alcon.de
BGH-LOGO
KG-toolshop
Trademark Orange
ECFI-Aurelia
Competition law
BGH-answer-obligation
BGH-Handy for 0
BVerfG-Benetton
OLG-Celle-anwalt-hannover-de
Computer Law
Mitwohnzent
OLGHH-stockexchangedata
OLGHH-Kulturwerbung.de
BGH-Mitwohnzentrale
BGH-Maxem
BGH-Paperboy
Food law
OLGCelle 13O320aus98
Copyright law
BGH-Urteil-Marlene Dietrich
OLGBS-Beschwerdewert-Auskunft
ECJ-Sony Falcon
Antitrust Law
BGH-Hörgeräteakustik
Employment Law
Attorneys Ethics law
AnwG-Taetigkeitsschwerpunkt
OLGStuttgart-Vanity-Nummer
BVerfG1BvR335aus97
Pharmaceutical Law
Telecommunications Law
inter
Contact
Enquiry
Power of Attorney
Download
Imprint
Privacy Policy
Links
Associations
Official Authorities
Universities
Legal Issues
Miscellaneous
Locations
Berlin
Bielefeld
Bremen
Düsseldorf
Frankfurt
Hamburg
Hanover
Munich
Stuttgart
Vienna

 

horak.
Attorneys at Law Hannover
Lawyers
Patent Attorneys
Georgstr. 48
30159 Hannover (Headquarter)
Germany
Fon +49 511.35 73 56-0
Fax +49 511.35 73 56-29
info@iprecht.de  
hannover@iprecht.de
 
horak.
Attorneys at Law Berlin
Lawyers
Patent Attorneys
Wittestraße 30 K
13509 Berlin
Germany
Fon +49 30.403 66 69-00
Fax +49 30.403 66 69-09
berlin@iprecht.de
 
horak.
Attorneys at Law Bielefeld
Lawyers
Patent Attorneys
Herforder Str. 69
33602 Bielefeld
Germany
Fon +49 521.43 06 06-60
Fax +49 521.43 06 06-69
bielefeld@iprecht.de
 
horak.
Attorneys at Law Bremen
Lawyers
Patent Attorneys
Parkallee 117
28209 Bremen
Germany
Fon +49 421.33 11 12-90
Fax +49 421.33 11 12-99
bremen@iprecht.de
 
horak.
Attorneys at Law Düsseldorf
Lawyers
Patent Attorneys
Grafenberger Allee 293
40237 Düsseldorf
Germany
Fon +49 211.97 26 95-00
Fax +49 211.97 26 95-09
duesseldorf@iprecht.de
 
horak.
Attorneys at Law Frankfurt/ Main
Lawyers
Patent Attorneys
Alfred-Herrhausen-Allee 3-5
65760 Frankfurt-Eschborn
Germany
Fon +49 69.380 79 74-20
Fax +49 69.380 79 74-29
frankfurt@iprecht.de
 
horak.
Attorneys at Law Hamburg
Lawyers
Patent Attorneys
Colonnaden 5
20354 Hamburg
Germany
Fon +49 40.882 15 83-10
Fax +49 40.882 15 83-19
hamburg@iprecht.de
 
horak. 
Attorneys at Law Munich
Lawyers
Patent Attorneys
Landsberger Str. 155
80687 Munich
Germany

Fon +49 89.250 07 90-50
Fax +49 89.250 07 90-59
munich@iprecht.de
 
horak.
Attorneys at Law Stuttgart
Lawyers
Patent Attorneys
Königstraße 80
70173 Stuttgart
Germany
Fon +49 711.99 58 55-90
Fax +49 711.99 58 55-99
stuttgart@iprecht.de
 
horak. 
Patent Attorneys Vienna
 
Trauttmansdorffgasse 8
1130 Vienna
Austria
Fon +43 1.876 15 17
Fax +49 511.35 73 56-29
vienna@iprecht.de

 

What is a utility model?

A utility model is a registered right which confers on its proprietor exclusive protection for an invention, in a similar manner to a patent. In fact, utility models are sometimes referred to as "petty patents" or "innovation patents." In general, as with a patent, to be protected by a utility model, an invention must be new, involve an inventive step, and lend itself to industrial application. A utility model right can be obtained for example for electronic circuits, machines, chemical products, foodstuffs and pharmaceutical products.

What are the main differences between utility models and patents?

A utility model is an unsearched and unexamined intellectual property right, i.e. novelty and inventive step are usually not examined prior to registration. Moreover, the level of inventiveness required is generally lower than that for a patent.

The term of protection for utility models is shorter than for patents (a maximum of 10 years). Furthermore, utility models are much cheaper to obtain and maintain and the registration process is significantly simpler and faster since patent offices do not examine applications as to substance prior to registration. The state of art in respect to utility models is restricted as compared with the state of art in respect of patents.

What is the term of protection for utility models?

The maximum term of protection of utility models is 10 years provided that the utility model is maintained, i.e. the three renewal fees are paid to the Patent and Trademark Office.

What territorial protection does a utility model offer?

There is presently neither a world-wide nor a Community-wide utility model (since April 2003, however, there has been a Community design providing for a single Community design registration).

Not all countries and regions provide the option of utility model protection. For example, the UK and the Netherlands do not presently have a utility model system. In 2001, however, the European Commission and the European Parliament discussed an EC Directive that would harmonise the existing utility model systems.

Can an invention be made known to the public?

A valid German patent can generally not be obtained if the invention has been made known to the public, even by the inventor himself. As far as utility models are concerned, though, an invention may be disclosed under certain conditions and only by the inventor himself before the application is made (a so called novelty period of grace of 6 months).

How to obtain a utility model?

German utility models are obtained by filing an application for a utility model to the German Patent Office. There is a form available from the German Patent and Trademark Office (http://dpma.de). Apart from this form, which includes an application, so-called claims, a description and a summary in German should be handed in. For the purpose of a better description, drawings are usually included. When filing an application, which will be scanned by the Patent Office, you should pay attention to a number of formal requirements, e.g. that the description, the claims and the summary each start with a special form and should be marked with an appropriate title. Moreover, there is almost a patent language of its own, in which certain expressions are used for structuring the text, signalling consequences etc.: the patent claims often include the expression “characterised by…” followed by the description of the actual invention, whereas the state of technology is delineated prior to this including references to existing patents. The description is usually introduced with the expression “the invention concerns” and then the generic term of the main patent claim is described. This is followed by the description of the state of technology, possibly including references to existing patents. After the basic description of the state of technology, the disadvantages are presented. Then, the expression “the task of the invention is …” introduces the description of the task, presenting the solution and its advantages. This description of the main claim is followed by the descriptions of the subordinate claims, introduced by the expression “… is a special type of implementation of …” Finally, a sample implementation is explained in detail by means of drawings.

When defining the claims, and especially the main claim, the wording is very important. Basically, a general description is preferred, in order to prevent competitors from avoiding an infringement of a utility model by merely changing minor points. On the other hand, the wording of claims must not be too general as there is a risk that they might be ineffective, because such a claim usually does not only contain the description of the invention but also elements of state-of-the-art technology.

What is the procedure of granting a utility model?

On filing, an application is checked for obvious formal faults, e.g. if documents are lacking, etc. After that, according to the type of application, a research or examination procedure is started. In the research procedure the relevant documents are determined and sorted out, this does not, however, influence the protective right itself, since patent offices do not examine applications as to substance prior to registration.

The examination procedure ends when a test certificate is issued, or possibly with the refusal to grant a utility model. In case of granting a utility model, a utility model is published in the patent journal and entered in the registry of utility models.

How can action be taken against a utility model – opposition proceedings?

Contrary to patents, there are no time-limited opposition proceedings in respect of utility models. Everyone can, however, oppose a utility model by filing a nullity suit. In the examination proceedings, which follow such a suit, novelty and inventive step are examined.

What do we need to register your invention?

Usually we need an outline, a description and possibly a model. In some cases, we need further details which we cannot state specifically since they depend on the complexity of the given object.

In the initial phase, in which we plan further proceedings, we only need general information on the area in question (electrical engineering, mechanical engineering, chemistry, etc.) so that our expert in charge can contact you and settle further details with you, including an estimation of costs.

 

ip-attorney-ip-lawyer german law german lawyer patent law patent application file patent lawyer print trademark-law-patent-domain-design-utility-model-europe design law eu design community design law design right international design save law-of-technics-multi-media-law-german-business-lawyerback european-trademark-protection-german-trademarks-european-lawenquiry